LEVEL 1 - 88 OF 136 STORIES The Boston Globe September 21, 1989, Thursday, City Edition SECTION: METRO/REGION; Pg. 29 LENGTH: 887 words HEADLINE: Dukakis staffers face grilling on state layoffs; McGovern hearing to focus on delays; human services coalition decries toll of budget cuts BYLINE: By M.E. Malone, Globe Staff KEYWORD: MICHAEL DUKAKIS; ADMINISTRATION; EMPLOYEE; DECREASE; BUDGET BODY: Top members of Gov. Dukakis' staff are expected to be put under a high-powered microscope today by Senate Ways and Means Committee Chairwoman Patricia McGovern as she begins a series of hearings expected to focus on one of the touchiest subjects on Beacon Hill - the layoff of state workers. Members of the governor's staff reportedly are angry at McGovern for her plan to scrutinize Dukakis' attempts to whittle down the state budget, but publicly have said that they are looking forward to the opportunity to present the savings and cuts they have made already. Today, heads of the state's biggest agencies are expected to detail the number of jobs they have eliminated in recent months, as well as how many workers will have to be laid off before the year is out. Administration and Finance Secretary L. Edward Lashman told House leaders earlier in the week that the state expects to reduce its total work force by 5,000, including the approximately 2,700 job slots eliminated since last summer. But legislative and administrative sources, who acknowledge that the state has been cutting back by not filling vacant jobs, said that only about 300 layoff notices have been mailed this month. In August, the administration's budget analysts predicted that about 1,400 layoffs would be needed by Oct. 1 because of the $ 491 million in cuts announced by Dukakis in July. This week, Lashman told department heads to formulate budget reduction plans by Oct. 15 that would trim an additional 5 percent from their agencies in the face of lower-than-expected revenues. No estimates are yet available as to how many more jobs will be lost to meet those targets. Because the state has promised workers 30 days' notice of layoffs, McGovern has expressed concern that the state is dragging its feet, and will end up laying off more workers later in the year and is wasting money as a result. "My trouble now is that the longer it takes us to cope with these problems, the worse the deficits are," McGovern said. PAGE 26 (c) 1989, The Boston Globe, September 21, 1989 McGovern estimates that the state's deficit for this year is more than $ 400 million, including $ 170 million in revenue shortfalls, $ 70 million in group insurance costs, and millions more in health and welfare benefits than the state had included in the budget. To make up for at least $ 295 million of the expected deficit, House and administration leaders continue to exchange plans for either raising more money or cutting spending. Included in the administration's latest draft is a special lottery game tied to professional football that, if approved, would likely premiere next fall. Gone from the ever-changing budget-balancing plan is a previous proposal, unpopular with many state legislators, to try to make state workers pay some of their health insurance premiums. A lawmaker from Amherst said yesterday that a major piece of the governor's budget-balancing package would drive up student fees in public colleges by at least $ 1,000 to $ 1,200 next semester. Democratic Rep. Stanley Rosenberg said Dukakis' plan to save $ 40 million by halting state payment of certain college costs would increase hospital fees at University of Massachusetts at Amherst and student dormitory fees at other UMass campuses. Rosenberg said the plan would merely shift payments from the state to the students and the patients at the UMass campus infirmary. "So this is funny money," he said, adding that it will take years to generate the $ 40 million in savings that Dukakis thinks he can obtain in a year. Rep. Susan Tucker (D-Andover) said most of the savings proposals currently floating around Beacon Hill, including the governor's and several put forth by House members, are overblown. "You have to be very, very skeptical of every single item," she said. A coalition of human service agencies yesterday also cast doubt on the government's ability to raise between $ 200 million and $ 300 million without cutting services that it considers vital to some elderly, poor, handicapped or homeless people. "To the extent that budget-cutters do not concentrate on the efficient collection of fees, fines and federal reimbursements, it doesn't take long before the pocket calculators are applied to making cuts in services," the Massachusetts Human Services Coalition said in an analysis of the cuts in the 1990 budget. Deborah Weinstein, author of the budget report, said she hopes state leaders will learn that they cannot call for across-the-board cuts of 5 or 10 percent without "devastating effects." "What we hope is that people will see the budget in terms of human services and see that, already, those that have been hurt by cuts are the most vulnerable, low-income people," she said. Weinstein also criticized those competing to succeed Dukakis as governor for neglecting the needs of the state's poor residents when outlining their ideals PAGE 27 (c) 1989, The Boston Globe, September 21, 1989 and goals for the office, saying they are "budgeting by robot" when they propose across-the-board cuts. Prominent on the list of budget cuts most hurtful to the state's poor is the decision to pay welfare recipients the same amount they received last year, at the same time that housing, child care, transportation, and medical expenses and other needs are rising. "Everywhere a poor person turns, the state is cutting off help," Weinstein said.